Queen 2011 remasters: horrible

As an audophile, I care a lot about my music collection. Some albums do have multiple pressings, with new remastered versions of the same old material. These remasters rarely surpass the originals, they tend to be overcompressed due to the infamous loudness wars, but I always seek to hear them, waiting for a miracle.

Right now I’m listening to the Queen 2011 remasters, which sound all really bad to my ears. I’ve read somewhere that Bob Ludwig was responsible for this work, but it’s hard to believe that such a great professional have done such a shitty job. Some songs – particularly the heavier ones – have so much compression that distortion is openly audible. The Jazz album is the worst one so far, with burnt peaks on all tracks, a mess of noise.

The Sheer Heart Attack song, from News of the World album, is a full block of deafening noise, that gave me a headache before the second minute ended, and I had to skip it. The same for the heavy parts of Brighton Rock and Stone Cold Crazy, from Sheer Heart Attack album. Basically, the songs are ruined, sounding really harsh, overcompressed on every single opportunity.

Label managers of today are not only stupid, they are deaf too. When I see things like this, I only can hope that digital music distribution kills this industry as soon as possible, as it is already happening. With the home studios and the internet, we don’t need their greed anymore.

JavaScript anonymous closures

Today I was going to write about my fruitful experiments in JavaScript using anonymous closures, scope and namespacing in general. But I stumbled across two articles that are so good, that I just felt the need to publish the links to both, because they explain everything I was about to write in great detail:

• JavaScript Module Pattern: In-Depth, by Ben Cherry (2010); and
• Namespacing in JavaScript, by Angus Croll (2011).

As of today, 3+ years old articles, which are still contemporary and relevant to JavaScript development. Highly recommended reading.

Logitech, please bring back the wired Trackman Wheel

About 2 years ago I was suffering from some wrist pain, due to countless hours of computer work with an ordinary mouse. I started searching for some device to relieve the pain, and after test several gadgets, I came across the Logitech Trackman Wheel. It’s a trackball which sphere is moved with the thumb, leaving the whole hand resting on the desk. And it’s absolutely great, precise, comfortable, I could use that thing for hours without any signs of tiring.

This week, however, the left click just started acting numb, unresponsive, and I found a video teaching a way that could possibly fix it. After three days, the problem seemed to be unfixable, so I decided to buy another unit of this wonderful thing. But to my surprise, I found out the Logitech discontinued the Trackman Wheel, in favor of a wireless version called M570, which like any laggy wireless device, relies on batteries, which require you to figure out when they start dying, so you can buy more batteries to replace the old ones, if you don’t have them dying in the middle of an online game, for example, case when you’d be screwed. Oh, and also it has an annoying switch to turn on and off, so that’s another thing you have to remember to do. The Trackman is supposed to stay fixed on the desk, so why the hell do you need a wireless version of it?

I’m not the only one who wants the wired Trackman Wheel back, there’s even a group on Facebook with people discussing this. Unfortunately, Logitech didn’t reply the user complains, and so far there’s no hope to have a wired version of our beloved Trackman Wheel.

I could not find any unit to buy, not even on eBay. By now, I’m desperately trying to find a way to fix my old and good Trackman Wheel, to use it for as long as I can. And to Logitech, for blindly joining this wireless bandwagon, I just want to leave a sincere fuck you, Logitech.

Update, Jan 11:
This morning I found a skillful electrician who managed to swap the bad left click component with the middle click one, which was working fine. Now I don’t have a middle click anymore, but at least my beloved Trackman Wheel is usable again.

Creating project templates for Visual Studio 2013

There are a couple of project settings that I set for every native C++ Win32 project I want to start, basically, more aggressive optimizations for the release build.

Right now, messing around with my brand new Visual Studio 2013 – which I’m appreciating so far –, I discovered how to create a template project with all the settings I need, including subfolders and files. I found this article which explains the process for an ASP.NET MVC project, but the steps are the same for a C++ one.

The templates are exported as ordinary ZIP files, and importing existing ones is trivial, you just need to copy this ZIP file into the base directory. On my computer, this is the full path for the custom user templates:

C:\Users\Rodrigo\Documents\Visual Studio 2013\Templates\ProjectTemplates

In addition to the project settings, I also put in the template a subdirectory called “src”, my very basic main.cpp file, which contains my wWinMain entry point. It seems that I’ll never have to write it again.

A simple C++ smart pointer class

Until I started using move semantics of C++11, I used this smart pointer class, which is template-based, heavily relies on operator overloading, and uses an instance counter:

template<typename T> class Ptr {
public:
	Ptr()                 : _ptr(NULL), _counter(NULL) { }
	Ptr(T *ptr)           : _ptr(NULL), _counter(NULL) { operator=(ptr); }
	Ptr(const Ptr& other) : _ptr(NULL), _counter(NULL) { operator=(other); }
	~Ptr() {
		if(_counter && !--(*_counter)) {
			delete _ptr;     _ptr = NULL;
			delete _counter; _counter = NULL;
		}
	}
	Ptr& operator=(T *ptr) {
		this->~Ptr();
		if(ptr) {
			_ptr = ptr; // take ownership
			_counter = new int(1); // start counter
		}
		return *this;
	}
	Ptr& operator=(const Ptr& other) {
		if(this != &other) {
			this->~Ptr();
			_ptr = other._ptr;
			_counter = other._counter;
			if(_counter) ++(*_counter);
		}
		return *this;
	}
	bool isNull() const         { return _ptr == NULL; }
	T& operator*()              { return *_ptr; }
	const T* operator->() const { return _ptr; }
	T* operator->()             { return _ptr; }
	operator T*() const         { return _ptr; }
private:
	T   *_ptr;
	int *_counter;
};

Example usage:

struct When {
	int month;
	int day;
};

Ptr<When> GetLunchTime()
{
	Ptr<When> ret = new When(); // alloc pointer to be owned
	ret->month = 12;
	ret->day = 16;
	return ret;
}

int main()
{
	Ptr<When> lunchTime = GetLunchTime();
	// ...
	// no need to delete lunchTime
	return 0;
}

It works fine, but with the implementation of move semantics – which is truly great –, it seems that I don’t need it anymore. So I’m publishing it here for historical reasons.

C++11 move semantics are amazing

Right now I’m testing Visual C++ 2013, which implements some interesting innovations from C++11 specification. I started taking a look at some of them, and the move semantics instantly caught my attention because they solve a problem I was just facing. I implemented a smart pointer class so that I could return a string object from a function – my own String class, I don’t use STL –, and it was something like this:

Ptr<String> Function() {
	Ptr<String> ret = new String();
	return ret;
}

This worked perfectly fine. What bugged me was that two more allocations are needed on this approach: the internal smart pointer instance counter, and the pointer itself. These two allocations, of course, are summed up to the internal String array allocation, so I ended up with three memory allocations for a trivial string return. That sounded too much to my optimization paranoia.

Now, with the new C++11 move semantics, when we write the constructor and the assignment operator for a class, we write specific code to use when receiving a temporary object, which will be destroyed right after the operation completes – it means we can do whathever we want with this temporary object, no one will bother. After implementing the move semantics on my String class, and on the underneath Array class which powers it, I could rewrite the above function like this:

String Function() {
	String ret;
	return ret;
}

My return object is allocated on the stack, not heap-allocated, so we have saved one allocation. And since I’m not returning a pointer – but rather returning the object my value – we don’t need the smart pointer anymore, so we saved another allocation. In the end, we shrinked down from three to only one single allocation, the internal string array itself. With the move semantics implemented, the internal string array just flies from an object into another, without cloning the whole array.

Right now I feel I won’t even need my smart pointer class anymore, as I’ll refactor all my classes to take advantage of the move semantics: the implications are huge. This will result in a general optimization, saving several memory allocations all around. And that’s amazing. All right, call me a C++11 guy now, it has just got me, I’ve been converted.

Sound Forge 11: no FX chain apply?

I’m a long time Sound Forge user, since the golden pre-Sony Sonic Foundry days, when the horrendous .NET Framework, a toy for script kiddies, was not needed. I’ve been following the version upgrades until today, when I gladly installed version 11. One of my most used options – applying the FX chain right away – simply disappeared. I’ve been searching around, and I found that I’m not the only one who complains about this.

There’s an alternative way to apply the FX chain through the FX Favorites menu, but it’s cumbersome and you cannot work upon the waveform while it’s open. Ironically, the new FX chain window is one of the “new” things Sony is marketing about. Well, congratulations for messing it out, Sony. I’ll pass.

I rolled back to Sound Forge 10, and I’m keeping it. Let’s see if a future Sound Forge 12 will bring that facility back.